I've been doing my monthly Online EQA System grading over the past couple of days. Sadly I can't reveal my results for legal reasons (and the fact that it would send my patients running for the hills in terror), but the main issue I have with the system is quite simply the amount of time it takes to complete an image set.
We were told that it should take us approximately ninety minutes a month, which sounds perfectly reasonable. In reality, however, even the fastest grader in the west couldn't get through an image set in that time. The EQA website is as slow as a ninety-year-old diabetic with bad feet, and makes you feel like you've gone back to the bad old days of dial-up. I had to shut it down and log back in more than half a dozen times yesterday after the whole thing ground to complete halt and wouldn't move.
I don't know if the answer is better servers, more bandwidth, or just a few extra hamsters on the generator wheel, but something needs to be done. It's taken me the best part of two days to get through thirty questions, and it's time I can ill afford to spare. I'm all in favour of monthly EQA tests to ensure that we're all grading to a reasonable standard, and to give us a few pointers if we're not, but at the moment the system isn't really fit for purpose.
7 comments:
hi i have just read the whole of your blog archive , i must say it made me laugh in places and it feels like we are living the same life lol , my name is sarah and i am a screener grader for the nhs , i will keep popping on to read the next episode lol x
Thanks Sarah! :o)
Yep I'm a screener/grader in high street practice and couldn't agree with you more. The EQA should give a comparison to real life. If I had diabetes I would expect at least say 120 seconds of viewing/analysis of any photographs or my retinae. That would equate to at least 2hrs to grade the sixty images per month. What an earth is the point of city and guilds exams meetings studying etc if you then don't spend enough time studying the images MADNESS.
hi
It would seem I am not alone!
I just want some feed back as to why I am not getting 100%!!!
someone to show me where I am going wrong - I thought I was good at this stuff and even when I really take my time I am not getting them all correct - or maybe I am and whoever initially graded is actually the mistake maker!!!
Apart from the time factor- a real pain. Your comment that feedback is useful hit the nail on the head. There is no way in which this episode is helpful. Beacause we never get to know what is right and wrong we do not learn from it. In fact, it is detrimental because it undermines your confidence.Like the previous comment I graded an artifact as R0 but the only error in my set ( as far as R0/R1 is concerned )was that I'd missed an R1 - who decides what is correct?
I agree with all of you. I find the images are not very good quality......
Im an nhs screener/grader too and often take 2.5 hrs to complete EQA having to keep logging back on. Contacted them and was told that no one else had reported it and must be my IT/server. Our manager said it must be the site where I was and not to do it there again.
In our allotted a.m. or p.m. test we also have to r/v and list the previous months EQA and give reason for disagreement, same with previous months screener intergrader report with reason for disagreements, contribute to some required reports that have fallen behind + CPD file...................need I say more....yes I will - images that would definitely be graded as U keep appearing, images that I would never submit for grading in my job, not using the same programme to grade, having to set up every time the light/dark as no highlighting with a 'swipe'....IRMAs - check out different results where some are circled as IRMA yet other anomalies looking the same are not.....I could go on but I will stop
Post a Comment